Scientific journal
Fundamental research
ISSN 1812-7339
"Перечень" ВАК
ИФ РИНЦ = 1,674

Personal portfolio

THE DIRECTION OF THE FUNCTIONAL INFRINGEMENTS OF MUSCLES OF THE DOG S LIMBS AFTER PANCREATECTOMY

Sumkina O.B. 1 Hodgajan A.B. 1 Belova N.G. 1
1 Stavropol State Medical Academy, Stavropol
The functional disorders of the skeletal muscles after pancreatectomy were studied.. The removal of the pancreas was performed under the abacterial conditions. We investigated the lability (fanctional mobility) of skeletal muscles of the dog”s limbs before and after the operation, using mechanographycal method. The study of lability levels gives us the best possibility to make a deep and complete analysis of the functional changes of the skeletal muscles. In an early stage after the operation on the mechanograms we noticed the disturbance of the rhythm of the of the muscular contracts, decreasing their level. A plain tetanus revealed itself earlier than in the control period. The more time passed after the operation, the greater and more evident the changes become. A pessimal reaction was revealed at a low frequency level. And at medium and high frequency levels one could see a distinct phenomenon of pessimum or no pessimum at all. Analysis of material shows us that pancreatectomy causes redusing of the functional mobility a disorders of function of the skeletal muscles revealed itself in reducing of the level of contractions, impossibility to maintain high rhythm of the work, fast tiredness .In the back limbs these changes were deeper than in front limbs. As a result- we see serious disturbance of skeletal muscles and a bad long- term prognosis.
skeletal muscles
pancreatectomy
functional mobility
disorders
contraction
pessimum
tetanus
1. Aglullin I.R., Taziev R.N., Ismagilov A.A. Materialy 1 slezda onkologov stran SNG. (ProceedingsoftheICongressofOncologistsCIS.) M, 1996, p. 330.
2. Bondarenko V.N. Materialy I slezda onkologov stran SNG. (Proceedings of the I Congress of Oncologists CIS.) M, 1996, рр. 330–331.
3. Danilov M.V., Pomelov V.S., Vishnevskij V.A. idr. Hirurgija, 1990, no 10, pp. 94–100.
4. Danilov M.V., Fedorov V.D. Hirurgija podzheludochnoj zhelezy [Pancreatic surgery]. M: Medicina 1995; 502 p.
5. Vedeneeva I.V. V kn. Ostraja ishemija i rannie postishemicheskie rasstrojstva [ In. Acute ischemia and early postischemic disorders.] Moscow, 1978/ p68.
6. Neretin V.Ja., Kotov S.V., Petina L.V., i dr. Zhurnal nevrologii i psihiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova 1999, Vol97, no. 2, pp. 34–38.
7. PoljakR.I. Zhurnal Patologicheskaja fiziologijaije k sperimental’naja terapija., 1959, no. 1, pp. 79–80.
8. SumkinaO.B. V sbornike: Aktual’nye voprosy travmatologii, ortopedii, hirurgii. [Inthe book: Issues traumatology, orthopedics surgeons.] Stavropol’, 1998, p. 142.
9. Chernjavskij A.A., Ershov V.V., Strazhnov A.V. Hirurgija 2002, no 6, pp. 17–21.
10. Cameron J.L., Pitt H.A., Yeoch J. At al. One Handred and Forty-Five Concecutive Pancreaticoduodenectomies Without Mortality // Ann. Surg 1993,217:5: 430–438.
11. Doerr R.J.,Yildiz I., Flint L.M. Pancreaticoduodenectomy: University Expirience and Resident Education // Arch Surg 1990, 125: 4: 463–465.

Рецензенты:

Вафин А.З., д.м.н., профессор кафедры госпитальной хирургии Ставропольской государственной медицинской академии, г. Ставрополь;

Щетинин Е.В., д.м.н., профессор, заведующий кафедрой патологической физиологии Ставропольской государственной медицинской академии, г. Ставрополь.